This document is a comparative analysis of three curriculum implementation models, written by a student for a course. It examines the Leadership-Obstacle Course (LOC) Model, the Linkage Model, and the Organizational Development (OD) Model, focusing on their philosophical assumptions, major features, strengths, limitations, and relevance to Philippine higher education.
This document is a comparative analysis of three curriculum implementation models, written by a student for a course. It examines the Leadership-Obstacle Course (LOC) Model, the Linkage Model, and the Organizational Development (OD) Model, focusing on their philosophical assumptions, major features, strengths, limitations, and relevance to Philippine higher education. The paper is intended for educators, school leaders, and students of education, particularly those interested in curriculum…
The introduction explains that a curriculum's value only becomes evident when it reaches a real classroom and is translated into instruction. It argues that implementation is a process involving teachers, students, school leaders, and the entire educational environment. The author chose the LOC, Linkage, and OD models for comparison because they highlight varying but connected areas of implementation.
The comparative analysis table details each model. The LOC Model assumes resistance to change is an obstacle to be identified, not neglected. The Linkage Model connects educational innovations to actual problems, recognizing user and resource systems. The OD Model, associated with Richard Schmuck and Matthew Miles, emphasizes long-term organizational improvement through collaboration and teamwork.
The analysis of strengths notes the LOC Model is practical, helping leaders identify barriers to compliance. The Linkage Model bridges the research-practice gap, connecting universities with schools. The OD Model is sustainable, developing the organization alongside the curriculum, as seen in DepEd's MATATAG pilot implementation.
Limitations include the LOC Model being too problem-centered and dependent on effective leadership. The Linkage Model requires strong communication and can create unequal relationships between researchers and teachers. The OD Model can be time- and resource-heavy, and collaboration does not always guarantee productive outcomes.
The document concludes that curriculum implementation is where educational ideals meet realities. The LOC, Linkage, and OD models are useful because they focus on people, knowledge, and organizations. The paper is relevant to Philippine higher education, addressing national reforms, teacher education, and institutional culture.